![]() ![]() ![]() But because the film was so dark, Disney fired Burton. My dad loved this version of the movie and it was a mainstay in our house for years. I won't be the only one making this comparison, but did Burton make the villain of his "Dumbo" an evil Walt Disney? Tim Burton made a live action version of "Frankenweenie" for Disney back in 1984. The lessons of "Dumbo" are learned early on and the rest of the movie coasts by escalating the problems to monumental levels. How does one find that much extra material when the source is so scant? "Dumbo" has the same problem. She cites the live action adaptation of "Where the Wild Things Are." The movie is very pretty, but the book only lasts five minutes when read aloud. My wife often points out that film adaptations of children's books rarely pan out the way we want them to. That's a lot of elephant abuse.Ī Third-Person Limited War: Sam Mendes’ '1917' Read article "Dumbo," on the other hand clocks in at an hour and fifty-two minutes. But adaptations of "The Ugly Duckling," are not dreadfully long. It is a nuclear version of The Ugly Duckling narrative. If I was to strip away the circus façade, a now dated setting for a film, the basis for the movie is about treating poorly children who look different. Tim Burton tries to make us really care for Dumbo, this neglected child who is consistently extorted throughout the film.īut the template for "Dumbo" is remarkably bleak. "Dumbo" is the best version of a movie that has a lot of cards stacked against it. We're too close to the summer for it not to be something that is supposed to wow audiences with the adventures of a flying elephant. I'm not surprised to see that "Dumbo" is now an adventure film. Settling the events of the first film in the first half-hour to forty minutes, the new plot is almost completely tonally different than the original film. "Dumbo," the new film, hits the few nostalgic moments hard and early, while offering practically a new movie. But everything else about the original film could kind of go out the window. There had to be a circus and there had to be a message about the importance of family. Instead, the smartest choice Disney can make is to release a movie like "Dumbo" in the midst of a string of hits.ĭumbo the character had to have big ears and he had to fly. Could I garner steam from that list? Absolutely not. Now, imagine that I own these properties and I have to keep the nostalgia train rolling. What will we have left? "The Rescuers." "Oliver and Company." "The Aristocats," "Meet the Robinsons," "Bolt." But can we have those kinds of summer remake releases forever? No, of course not.Įventually, we will have watched every single element of our nostalgia. Those are the movies that defined the childhood of my generation. This year sees the premiere of both "Aladdin" and "The Lion King." Those are some heavy hitters. Still, I can't really be angry at Disney for making the films. Audiences will pay to see these characters vibrant and alive again, because they just need to return to the feelings evoked by the original films once again. They hold the rights to these images and characters and want them to find new life. Disney is aware that the nostalgia for their characters is palpable. There are, actually, only a handful of remakes that can outshine their predecessors, and I wouldn't recommend many of them to families.ĭisney's use of the live-action remake seems most like a surgical strike on an audience's pocketbook. But I kind-of-sort-of liked "The Jungle Book." I don't gush over it because I have a precious cinematic street cred to hold onto.īut even though I actually kind of liked one of these movies, I understand the live-action Disney remakes will never hold the place that the original movies had. "Cinderella" was a phenomenally pretty movie that really didn't hold much heart for me. I didn't care for "Beauty and the Beast," because of its over-reliance on computer generated characters. So far, they have mostly been functional. ![]() I don't think I'm the only one who has looked at Disney's live action remakes of its animated classics with a bit of suspicion. It is an effort to test the waters of what audiences will accept from Disney's string of live action remakes. "Dumbo" is not a movie meant to stand on its own two feet. I just watched a corporation make a move in a grand cinematic strategy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |